updated Thu. September 19, 2024
-
New Jersey Herald
October 12, 2017
"The constitutionally guaranteed 'freedom to be intellectually ... diverse or even contrary,' and the 'right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order,' encompass the freedom to express publicly one's opinions about our flag, including those opinions which are defiant or contemptuous.".
Christian Post
September 27, 2017
In fact, in Street v. New York (1969), the Supreme Court held that the government may not punish a person for uttering words critical of the flag, writing that "the constitutionally guaranteed 'freedom to be intellectually . . . diverse or even contrary,' and the 'right to differ as to things that touch the heart of theÃÂ ...
The Hill (blog)
September 1, 2017
The day after the U.S. Supreme Court ended its 2015-2016 term, three justices issued a troubling statement. It was four months after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, and the Court had just fallen one vote short of taking a significant religious freedom case. In response, Justice Samuel Alito, joined byÃÂ ...
Mic
November 29, 2016
After a litany of complaints against CNN's refusal to toe the line on President-elect Donald Trump's false claims millions of people illegally voted in the presidential elections, he ignited another Twitter-based firestorm Tuesday. "Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag," Trump tweeted. "If they doÃÂ ...
New Jersey Herald
October 12, 2017
"The constitutionally guaranteed 'freedom to be intellectually ... diverse or even contrary,' and the 'right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order,' encompass the freedom to express publicly one's opinions about our flag, including those opinions which are defiant or contemptuous.".
Christian Post
September 27, 2017
In fact, in Street v. New York (1969), the Supreme Court held that the government may not punish a person for uttering words critical of the flag, writing that "the constitutionally guaranteed 'freedom to be intellectually . . . diverse or even contrary,' and the 'right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the ...
Mic
November 29, 2016
After a litany of complaints against CNN's refusal to toe the line on President-elect Donald Trump's false claims millions of people illegally voted in the presidential elections, he ignited another Twitter-based firestorm Tuesday. "Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag," Trump tweeted. "If they do ...
LubbockOnline.com
June 13, 2015
For example, in the first flag burning case, Street v. New York, Sidney Street, a young African-American man, upon hearing of the shooting of James Meredith (first black to enroll at Ole Miss), burned his flag which he theretofore had proudly displayed on patriotic holidays, and said: “If they can let that ...
New Jersey Law Journal
August 28, 2017
In citing Street v. New York, the court stated that the "public expression of ideas may not be prohibited merely because the ideas areÃÂ ...
The Legal Intelligencer
July 28, 2017
... to some of their hearers'" (citing Street v. New York, 394 U.S. 576 (1969)) and "If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment,ÃÂ ...
Tilak Marg (blog)
July 2, 2017
According to the United States Patent & Trademark Office, a 'trademark' is: a word, phrase, symbol, or design, or a combination thereof, thatÃÂ ...
Mic
November 29, 2016
After a litany of complaints against CNN's refusal to toe the line on President-elect Donald Trump's false claims millions of people illegally votedÃÂ ...
Peach Pundit
July 25, 2015
... federal and state statutes that prohibit desecration of the American flag on at least three occasions — Street v. New York (1969), Texas v.
LubbockOnline.com
June 13, 2015
For example, in the first flag burning case, Street v. New York, Sidney Street, a young African-American man, upon hearing of the shooting ofÃÂ ...
Pacific Daily News
December 24, 2016
The following year, the Court decided Street v. New York, an actual flag-burning case. Upon learning that civil rights activist James Meredith had been shot, Sidney Street burned a flag in public.
Peacock Panache
November 29, 2016
In Street v. New York, 394 U.S. 576 (1969), we held that a State may not criminally punish a person for uttering words critical of the flag.
Mic
November 29, 2016
After a litany of complaints against CNN's refusal to toe the line on President-elect Donald Trump's false claims millions of people illegally voted in the presidential elections, he ignited another Twitter-based firestorm Tuesday.
|
news and opinion
|
