updated Sun. February 25, 2024
-
ABA Journal
October 19, 2017
The U.S. Supreme Court considered First Amendment protections for political employees in Elrod v. Burns, according to Wilkinson's opinion.
Courthouse News Service
October 18, 2017
Judge Chuang also cited the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Elrod v. Burns. “Here, as in Elrod, First Amendment interests were either ...
SCOTUSblog (blog)
August 10, 2017
A leading example is the line of patronage cases that began with Elrod v. Burns, in which the Supreme Court struck down the practice of firing ...
Sunshine State News
June 21, 2017
That, according to Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976). In other words, it doesn't matter that the school district reinstated J.P. It still gave ...
Haaretz
February 9, 2017
(quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976))). The Government suggests that the Executive Order's discretionary waiver provisions are a ...
The Economist (blog)
January 21, 2016
After a rather flat-footed response invoking a 40-year-old case, Elrod v Burns, where the court ruled that public employees couldn't be fired for ...
SCOTUSblog (blog)
January 12, 2016
First Amendment limits on patronage originated with Elrod v. Burns in 1976; prior to that, “there was no doubt regarding the constitutionality of ...
Lawfare (blog)
December 31, 1999
The Supreme Court held in Elrod v. Burns that “loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes ...
The National Law Journal (registration)
September 5, 2017
In his filing, Aghaian quoted the U.S. Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Elrod v. Burns: “The loss of First Amendment freedoms, even for minimalÃÂ ...
SCOTUSblog (blog)
August 10, 2017
A leading example is the line of patronage cases that began with Elrod v. Burns, in which the Supreme Court struck down the practice of firingÃÂ ...
Sunshine State News
June 21, 2017
That, according to Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976). In other words, it doesn't matter that the school district reinstated J.P. It still gaveÃÂ ...
The Recorder
May 9, 2017
See Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976). Because we hold that RFC did not demonstrate that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its FirstÃÂ ...
Haaretz
February 9, 2017
(quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976))). The Government suggests that the Executive Order's discretionary waiver provisions are aÃÂ ...
SCOTUSblog (blog)
January 12, 2016
First Amendment limits on patronage originated with Elrod v. Burns in 1976; prior to that, “there was no doubt regarding the constitutionality ofÃÂ ...
Arizona Capitol Times
January 7, 2016
A state lawmaker wants to make criminals out of some people who take videos of cops questioning or arresting someone. The proposal by Sen.
Los Angeles Post-Examiner
February 10, 2017
(quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976)))." The Trump Administration is expected to appeal this decision to the Supreme Court, especially since Jeff Sessions has been sworn in as Attorney General.
Haaretz
February 10, 2017
(quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976))). The Government suggests that the Executive Order's discretionary waiver provisions are a sufficient safety valve for those who would suffer unnecessarily, but it has offered no explanation for how ...
Inside Higher Ed
November 16, 2016
See Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 96 S.Ct. 2673, 49 L.Ed.2d 547 (1976). The The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) would also stand at odds with your statement.
Texas Lawyer
October 4, 2016
Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373, 96 S. Ct. 2673, 2690 (1976) (citing New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713, 91 S. Ct.
Texas Lawyer
October 4, 2016
Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373, 96 S. Ct. 2673, 2690 (1976) (citing New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713, 91 S. Ct.
Lexology (registration)
September 16, 2016
However, that decidedly pro-management attitude has drastically changed in recent decades, following a pair of significant decisions by the U.S.
The Recorder
June 1, 2016
Id. (quoting Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 359 n.13 (1976)). Although the "prototypical" First Amendment retaliation case arises from the termination of public employment, see Blair, 608 F.3d at 544, we have recognized claims for First Amendment ...
Courthouse News Service
May 6, 2016
The Supreme Court has made clear that the '"loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury,"' Jackson wrote, citing two earlier cases: Elrod v. Burns and Croft v. Governor of Texas.
Main Line
April 19, 2016
And "[t]he loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury." Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976). Yet you are against all that and feel such acts are cowardly? Again, how quaint. I ...
|
news and opinion
|
