Sun Capital Advisors

Three years ago, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued a highly publicized decision finding that at least one private equity fund affiliated with Sun Capital Advisors qualified as a trade or business under this provision of the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act . LEARN MORE.

Ask politicians whether campaign contributions influence their decisions, and they'll tell you certainly not. Ask any citizen, and they'll likely give the opposite answer. With that in mind, we're re-introducing a web-based embeddable widget — for anybody to use — that lists the top 10 donors and their ...

The funds at issue were part of a larger family of funds advised by Sun Capital Advisors Inc. The funds invested in Scott Brass Inc. (“SBI”), ...

Of key concern was that the Sun Capital funds and their general partners ultimately took direction from the co-CEOs of Sun Capital Advisors, Inc ...

... private equity fund affiliated with Sun Capital Advisors qualified as a trade or business under this provision of the Multiemployer Pension Plan ...

... the general partner of Sun Capital Advisors V – L.P. – which is the general partner of SCP V. Each of Messrs. Krouse and Leder also controls ...

Ask politicians whether campaign contributions influence their decisions, and they'll tell you certainly not. Ask any citizen, and they'll likely give ...

In 2007, the Sun Funds, which are managed by Sun Capital Advisors, Inc., acquired indirect 30% and 70% ownership interests, respectively, in Scott Brass, Inc. (SBI), which was committed to a multi-employer pension fund.

The Sun Funds were limited partnership investments funds whose general partners were Sun Capital Advisors III and Sun Capital Advisors IV, respectively. The partnerships had limited partner committees composed of individual principals Marc Leder and ...

In the latest installment in the much-watched Sun Capital litigation, on March 28, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a decision finding a group of private equity funds managed by affiliates of Sun Capital ...

The funds at issue were part of a larger family of funds advised by Sun Capital Advisors Inc. The funds invested in Scott Brass Inc. ("SBI"), structuring the investment on a 70/30 basis for several reasons, including the desire to remain below the 80 ...

The funds at issue were part of a larger family of funds advised by Sun Capital Advisors Inc. The funds invested in Scott Brass Inc. ("SBI"), structuring the investment on a 70/30 basis for several reasons, including the desire to remain below the 80 ...

There was a direct economic benefit to the Sun Capital Funds that an ordinary, passive investor would not derive: any fees earned by the Sun Capital Advisors or its affiliates from portfolio companies could offset or carryforward against the management ...

Proof of being an "investor plus" was active involvement in management of SBI by the funds in question evidenced by the combination of consulting fees paid to Sun Capital Advisors by SBI that, in turn, engendered management fee credits for the benefit ...

Each of the Sun Funds were managed by a general partner controlled by two principals, Marc Leder and Rodger Krouse, who were co-CEOs of Sun Capital Advisors, Inc., which advised the Sun Funds, structured their deals, and provided management ...

In Sun Capital, two funds advised by Sun Capital Advisors, Inc. (Fund III and Fund IV) purchased indirect interests in an operating company, Scott Brass, Inc. (Scott Brass).

On remand from the First Circuit, the District Court for Massachusetts held private equity funds managed by Sun Capital Advisors, Inc. (Sun Capital) liable for ERISA withdrawal liability owed by a bankrupt portfolio company to a multiemployer pension plan.